Regarding the answers that have been explained, the Respondent requested the Court to decide in the exception to accept and grant the Respondent's exception in its entirety. In the subject matter of the case, reject all of the petitioner's requests and state that the Decree of the General Election Commission Number 360 of 2024 is correct.

Bawaslu, in its statement, explained that the results of the supervision of the Peureulak District Panwaslu during the recapitulation of votes at the sub-district level showed that one of the witnesses from the PKB Party raised an objection. The witness felt that the recapitulation results did not match the results they recapitulated according to the C Copy. The PPK then informed the witness to fill out the Witness Objection Form. However, the sub-district Panwaslu did not receive an objection form from the witness.

Furthermore, Safwani, a representative from Bawaslu, stated that the East Aceh Regency Panwaslih on February 28, 2024 had received and processed the Report with Registration Number: 007/Reg/LP/PUKab/01.1511.11/2024, which was reported by Mhd Yunan. The report basically accused the PPK of Peureulak District and the Panwaslu of Peureulak District of allegedly inflating or transferring the number of votes to candidate number 5 in the name of Azhari from the PKB Party. Based on the initial review, the report met the formal and material requirements. After being discussed by the Gakkumdu Center, the report was declared not to meet the elements of an election crime and then a status was issued dated March 26, 2024.

“There was a report, but when it was discussed at Gakkumdu, it did not meet the elements of a crime,” said Safwani.