Background of the Petition

The Petitioners—institutions engaged in legal consultation and advocacy—stated that they had never known or been involved in the process of forming the State-Owned Enterprises Law, and therefore considered that it was not fulfilled meaningful participation as a constitutional guarantee. They also argued that the State-Owned Enterprises Bill was not part of the Annual Priority Prolegnas, so there was a procedural defect.

In their petitum, the Petitioners requested the Constitutional Court to declare Law 1/2025 did not meet the requirements for the formation of laws based on the 1945 Constitution, declare that the Law was contrary to the 1945 Constitution so that it was not binding, and requested the postponement of the implementation of Law 1/2025 as provision until the final decision is handed down.