JAKARTA, LiterasiHukum.com– The provisions of Article 1 number 19 and Article 25 paragraph (1) letter c of Law Number 22 of 2009 concerning Road Traffic and Transportation (UU LLAJ) are considered not to create unfair treatment, discrimination, or equality issues before the law, safety, and welfare. Such is the legal consideration of Decision Number 149/PUU-XXIII/2025 on the application submitted by Singgih Wiryono and Yosafat Diva Bayu Wisesa. This decision was read out in the decision pronouncement hearing on Wednesday (17/9/2025).

Rejection of the Material Review of Article 1 Number 19 of the UU LLAJ

Constitutional Justice Arsul Sani read out the Court's legal considerations regarding the constitutionality of the norm of Article 1 number 19 of Law 22/2009. The Petitioners requested that the norm be declared conditionally unconstitutional as long as it is not interpreted that "traffic signaling devices must accommodate people with color vision deficiencies, such as changing the color and/or shape and/or distance between the lights of traffic signaling devices”. Arsul explained that Article 1 number 19 is part of the general provisions containing definitions. Granting the request to review this article will have implications for the validity of the entire norm in Law 22/2009 which refers to these general provisions. This, within reasonable limits of reasoning, can damage the structure of the norms of Law 22/2009 as a whole. Therefore, the Petitioner's argument regarding Article 1 number 19 of Law 22/2009 is declared legally groundless.